RESULTS
Results we can show you — and how we measure them.
Every figure on this page carries a label that says what kind of evidence stands behind it. Customers are not named. Details are shared in conversation under NDA.
HOW WE LABEL EVIDENCE
Verified result — measured against a documented baseline and confirmed by the customer
Customer-validated estimate — agreed benefit, not yet fully realized
Identified opportunity — quantified before implementation
Industry benchmark — third-party research, named source
Illustrative — an example, not a customer result
CASE STUDIES
Two engagements, reported at project close.
Both studies are anonymized by industry. Figures are as reported for the engagement described. They are not a forecast for your operation.
INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURER · SUPPLY CHAIN ENGINEERING
Transportation management, improved without replacing the TMS.
STARTING POINT
A TMS that had never been configured to match how the team worked, sporadic carrier integration, no cost-to-serve visibility and no central store for shipment documents.
WHAT WE DID
Reconfigured the existing TMS, upgraded carrier integrations for automatic status updates and proof of delivery, added Axxis carrier selection and rate optimization, and Bearing for cost-to-serve reporting.
RESULTS · WITHIN 120 DAYS OF IMPLEMENTATION
15%
improvement in on-time delivery
90%
fewer manual shipment status follow-ups
Reported at project close · Methodology available on request
CONSUMER PACKAGED GOODS · SUPPLY CHAIN ENGINEERING
Network optimization and DC relocation.
STARTING POINT
Rising supply chain costs, retailer compliance penalties and operational inefficiency affecting service to major North American retailers.
WHAT WE DID
Modelled the network and relocated a distribution centre, changed transportation and warehouse processes, and redefined inventory strategy: forecasting, replenishment and safety stock.
RESULTS · WITHIN THE FIRST YEAR AFTER IMPLEMENTATION
12%
lower transportation costs
8%
better on-time delivery
7%
lower warehousing costs
17 days
fewer days of inventory on hand
Reported at project close · Methodology available on request
IN PROGRESS
Engagements under way.
Where results have not been measured yet, we show what the engagement covers. Figures are added once they can be labelled.
MINING · MANAGED SERVICES
Integrated execution and freight control for a remote mine site
Vendor collection, load optimization, carrier coverage, freight audit and pay, and decision support in one operating model.
Engagement scope, not a result
INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURER · ENGINEERING
Outbound flatbed RFP and routing guide
95 asset-based carriers invited, 44 proposals, two bid rounds. Routing guide live August 2026.
Engagement facts · Savings shown once verified
FOOD & BEVERAGE · ENGINEERING
Intelligence and continuous improvement above freight audit
Validated data, KPI dashboards, an opportunity register and monthly engineering support, using Bearing and OnGaard.
Engagement scope, not a result
HOW WE MEASURE RESULTS
What stands behind every number.
For every result we publish, we keep a record of how it was measured. Ask us and we will walk you through it.
01
BASELINE
What was measured before the change, and from which data.
02
PERIOD
When the result was measured, and for how long.
03
METHOD
How the change was calculated, on a like-for-like basis.
04
SOURCE
Whose data it is, and who reviewed it.
05
LABEL
Which of the five evidence types it is.
If a figure cannot be labelled, we do not publish it.
YOUR OPERATION
Every result starts with a baseline.
A Productivity Assessment measures where you are today, with the data you already have, so any improvement can be shown against it.
